Use cases/ SaaS & Technology/Users churn at month two without a word
SaaS & Technology

Users churn at month two without a word

They activated, used the product twice, and then disappeared.

What it costs you today

Your activation looks fine. Month-one engagement is solid. Then month two hits and a cohort just stops. No support ticket, no cancellation note. You look at the analytics and see they used three features and never came back. You do not know what did not click.

How RadRoot is used here

RadRoot sends a five-question adaptive interview at day 45 to customers showing engagement decline, framed as a check-in, not a feedback form. Questions probe what the product was supposed to help with, whether it did, and what got in the way.

The file you would upload

A Stripe Billing - Customer Subscription Events export. One row is one customer subscription record. RadRoot reads the whole row, so every question can name something the person already knows is true.

Customer IDAccount Owner NameAccount Owner EmailAccount Owner TitleSubscription Start DatePlan NameMRR
cus_2K7M9PDavid Ortegadavid.ortega@brightfield-retail.example.comOperations Manager2025-12-18Professional249
cus_2K8N1QPriya Sharmapriya.sharma@novasync.example.orgProduct Lead2025-12-22Team499
cus_2K9R4TMarcus Liumarcus.liu@riverstone-consulting.example.netDirector of Client Services2025-12-29Enterprise1299
cus_2L1V7WAmanda Torresamanda.torres@pinnacle-health.example.comIT Manager2026-01-03Professional249
cus_2L2W8XHassan El-Aminhassan.elamin@convergent-labs.example.orgResearch Coordinator2026-01-07Team499

First 5 of 20 rows, first 7 of 13 columns. RadRoot interviewed the customer account owner on each row, and 7 of 20 answered.

One interview, exactly as it ran

Six options every time, including the ones that reflect badly on whoever sent it. Each question was written after the answer above it landed.

Q1You started with Cascade Analytics on February 1st and your team used it through mid-February. What were you hoping it would help you with?
Q2Did Cascade give you the donor insights you were looking for?
Q3Who on your team was driving the Cascade implementation?
Q4Did your priorities shift when the fundraiser planning started?
Q5Once the gala wraps up, would a CRM integration plan make Cascade worth revisiting?

The verdict it produced

Written for whoever ran the campaign. The respondent never sees it.

The executive director was leading the Cascade rollout to track donor engagement, but gala planning for an April event consumed the development team in mid-February. She acknowledged the product gave some useful insights but they need tighter CRM integration to make it work long-term. Once the event wraps, a credible integration plan would bring them back. This is a timing and feature gap, not a lost account.

ownership gap negative high confidence

The executive director was personally driving implementation but was pulled away by event planning.

workflow change negative high confidence

Annual gala planning in April consumed the development team's capacity and displaced other initiatives.

re-activation lever positive high confidence

A CRM integration plan would make the tool worth revisiting after the gala concludes.

churn trigger mixed medium confidence

The product provided partial value but lacked the CRM integration depth the team required.

initial intent positive high confidence

The customer wanted to monitor donor engagement across email and event touchpoints.

See this on your own data

Fifteen minutes, screen to screen. We run your real question through RadRoot while you watch, and you leave with the follow-up it wrote and a price.

Book 15 minutes Answer one yourself