Use cases/ Professional Services/Proposals go quiet after a promising discovery call
Professional Services

Proposals go quiet after a promising discovery call

They said it was exactly what they needed. Then nothing.

What it costs you today

The discovery call was enthusiastic. You customized the proposal, sent it on time, followed up twice, and heard nothing. You do not know if the budget was never real, if a competitor undercut you, or if something in the proposal itself killed the deal.

How RadRoot is used here

RadRoot sends a short five-question interview to the prospect contact framed as feedback on how you can improve your proposals. The adaptive questions follow whatever they disclose. "Budget constraint" leads to timeline; "competing option" leads to what mattered most in the comparison.

The file you would upload

A HubSpot CRM - Deals Export export. One row is one proposal sent after discovery call. RadRoot reads the whole row, so every question can name something the person already knows is true.

Deal IDDeal NameContact NameContact EmailContact TitleProposal Sent DateProposal Amount
DL-8834HR Transformation ProjectSarah Chensarah.chen@vanguard-manufacturing.example.comVP of Human Resources2026-01-15$127,500
DL-8901Supply Chain OptimizationJames Kowalskij.kowalski@brighton-foods.example.comDirector of Operations2026-01-22$89,000
DL-8956Leadership Development ProgramMaria Gonzalezmgonzalez@pinnacle-tech.example.orgChief People Officer2026-02-03$215,000
DL-9012Market Entry StrategyDavid Parkdpark@redstone-capital.example.netManaging Partner2026-02-11$178,000
DL-9087Customer Experience RedesignJennifer Walshjennifer.walsh@summit-retail.example.comVP of Customer Success2026-02-18$142,000

First 5 of 20 rows, first 7 of 14 columns. RadRoot interviewed the prospect contact on each row, and 9 of 20 answered.

One interview, exactly as it ran

Six options every time, including the ones that reflect badly on whoever sent it. Each question was written after the answer above it landed.

Q1You received our $178,000 proposal for market entry strategy work on February 11. What best describes what happened after you reviewed it?
Q2When you escalated the proposal, what was the main reason it needed to move up?
Q3Are you evaluating other firms for this project, or is it just our proposal under review?
Q4What was the single biggest concern about our proposal when compared to the alternatives?
Q5When do you expect the new decision-maker to make a final choice?

The verdict it produced

Written for whoever ran the campaign. The respondent never sees it.

David was ready to move forward, but a reorganization moved approval authority above him to someone who did not attend the discovery call. That new decision-maker is now comparing three firms, and the up-front payment structure in your proposal is the main sticking point. A decision is expected next quarter. You have a narrow window to revise payment terms and build rapport with the new stakeholder before they choose.

decision authority negative high confidence

The original champion no longer has approval authority due to a recent organizational change.

competitive landscape mixed high confidence

Meridian is one of three firms being actively compared for this engagement.

pricing structure negative high confidence

The payment terms were too front-loaded for the prospect's preference.

re-engage timing positive medium confidence

The new decision-maker will make a choice within the next quarter.

internal readiness negative medium confidence

The reorg disrupted the internal approval process and introduced new evaluation criteria.

See this on your own data

Fifteen minutes, screen to screen. We run your real question through RadRoot while you watch, and you leave with the follow-up it wrote and a price.

Book 15 minutes Answer one yourself