Workers see risks and do not report them until they become incidents.
Your near-miss reporting numbers are suspiciously low. Workers know the process but do not trust that reporting will change anything, or worry it will reflect on them. The first signal you get is an actual incident, by which point the cost in people and compliance is significant.
RadRoot runs anonymous monthly five-question pulse checks with floor crews. If someone flags a concern about equipment, the next question asks how long it has been an issue and whether a supervisor knows. Anonymity is explicit in the intro, which dramatically increases candor.
A Kronos Workforce Central - Active Shift Assignments export. One row is one shift assignment record. RadRoot reads the whole row, so every question can name something the person already knows is true.
| Assignment ID | Worker Name | Worker Email | Job Title | Department | Shift Start | Shift End |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASN-87412 | Marcus Chen | marcus.chen@hartwell-mfg.example.com | Machine Operator II | Assembly Line 3 | 2026-01-06 06:00 | 2026-01-06 14:30 |
| ASN-87419 | Debra Fontaine | debra.fontaine@hartwell-mfg.example.com | Material Handler | Warehouse Ops | 2026-01-06 14:00 | 2026-01-06 22:30 |
| ASN-87425 | Joel Ramsey | joel.ramsey@hartwell-mfg.example.com | Quality Inspector | QA Floor | 2026-01-07 06:00 | 2026-01-07 14:30 |
| ASN-87431 | Anita Bhatt | anita.bhatt@hartwell-mfg.example.com | Forklift Operator | Logistics | 2026-01-07 22:00 | 2026-01-08 06:30 |
| ASN-87438 | Travis Holbrook | travis.holbrook@hartwell-mfg.example.com | Welding Technician | Fabrication | 2026-01-08 06:00 | 2026-01-08 14:30 |
First 5 of 20 rows, first 7 of 13 columns. RadRoot interviewed the production floor worker on each row, and 5 of 20 answered.
Six options every time, including the ones that reflect badly on whoever sent it. Each question was written after the answer above it landed.
Written for whoever ran the campaign. The respondent never sees it.
Monica Delgado noticed different warning labels on a new solvent in Mix Room 2 and questioned whether ventilation was adequate. She raised the concern with her supervisor and was told the change had been reviewed. She is somewhat reassured but would like to see the documentation. This represents a successful use of the reporting process, though the outcome highlights an opportunity to improve transparency by posting reference material when chemicals are swapped. Her engagement is a positive signal.
A new solvent introduced in Mix Room 2 has raised questions about whether current ventilation is adequate.
The worker noticed differing label warnings between the old product and the new solvent.
The worker raised the ventilation question with her supervisor and received confirmation that it was reviewed.
The worker is somewhat confident in the ventilation setup but would prefer to see supporting documentation.
Workers would benefit from posted quick reference guides when chemical products are changed.
Fifteen minutes, screen to screen. We run your real question through RadRoot while you watch, and you leave with the follow-up it wrote and a price.