Use cases/ Hospitality & Events/Guests check out fine and post a 2-star review three days later
Hospitality & Events

Guests check out fine and post a 2-star review three days later

The checkout conversation was "great stay" and then a detailed complaint appeared.

What it costs you today

The front desk checkout is fast and friendly. The guest says everything was great. Three days later a detailed negative review appears describing multiple issues — room temperature, a noise problem, a billing confusion. None of it was said at checkout. Now you are responding publicly to something you could have fixed privately.

How RadRoot is used here

RadRoot sends guests a five-question adaptive interview 24 hours after checkout. Far enough from the transaction for honesty, close enough for the memory to be sharp. Framed as a personal note from the hotel, not a corporate form. Guests who had a problem are far more likely to disclose it here than at a front desk with a line behind them.

The file you would upload

A Opera Cloud PMS - Guest Checkout Register export. One row is one guest checkout record. RadRoot reads the whole row, so every question can name something the person already knows is true.

Confirmation NumberGuest NameGuest EmailCheck-In DateCheck-Out DateRoom NumberRoom Type
HG240156Michael Torresmichael.torres@blueridge-consulting.example.com2026-01-122026-01-15418Deluxe King
HG240201Sarah Chensarah.chen@meridian-partners.example.org2026-01-182026-01-20522Harbor View Suite
HG240289David Kowalskid.kowalski@personal.example.net2026-01-242026-01-27315Standard Queen
HG240334Rebecca Millsrebecca.mills@crestwood-analytics.example.com2026-02-012026-02-03604Junior Suite
HG240412James Parkjames.park@riverside-tech.example.org2026-02-082026-02-11211Deluxe King

First 5 of 20 rows, first 7 of 12 columns. RadRoot interviewed the guest on each row, and 8 of 20 answered.

One interview, exactly as it ran

Six options every time, including the ones that reflect badly on whoever sent it. Each question was written after the answer above it landed.

Q1You told the front desk that everything was perfect at checkout. Looking back, how accurate was that statement?
Q2You mentioned there were a couple of small things you did not bring up. Can you tell me what those were?
Q3Why did you decide not to mention the water pressure and temperature when you were checking out?
Q4Your final bill was $523.00. Was there anything about that amount or the charges that was unclear?
Q5If you were writing a review online, would you mention the water pressure or room temperature?

The verdict it produced

Written for whoever ran the campaign. The respondent never sees it.

Robert Nguyen told the front desk everything was perfect, but he did not mention that the shower had weak water pressure and the room was colder than he liked in the mornings. He did not think these were worth making a fuss over. His bill was straightforward. He might mention both issues in a review as minor points but would still rate the stay positively overall. This is a textbook case of checkout politeness concealing issues that will surface publicly later.

room quality negative medium confidence

The shower had weak water pressure and the room was colder than the guest preferred in the mornings.

billing clarity positive high confidence

The bill was straightforward with no confusion.

disclosure barrier negative high confidence

The guest said everything was perfect at checkout but did not mention two small issues because they did not think it was worth making a fuss.

review intent mixed medium confidence

The guest might mention the water pressure and temperature as minor points in a review but would rate the stay positively overall.

service recovery negative high confidence

No service recovery was possible because the guest withheld the feedback until after departure.

See this on your own data

Fifteen minutes, screen to screen. We run your real question through RadRoot while you watch, and you leave with the follow-up it wrote and a price.

Book 15 minutes Answer one yourself